First time here? Welcome.
Should prosthetics be banned?
share it: digg | stumbleupon | del.icio.us (what are these?)
There’s a very interesting discussion over at Run to Win on the recent calls to ban the use of prosthetics in international competition. This came about after South African double-amputee (both legs, below the knee) Oscar Pistorius was thought to have an unfair advantage. Does he? Does it matter? Should there be a rule change to accommodate the use of prosthetics?

Ready to bend some steel? Grab a copy of the Diesel Crew's Bending eBook. Superb.
If you enjoyed this article, please vote for it on digg. Thanks.
Comments




How is not having legs an unfair advantage?
Posted by: Russ | June 6, 2007 7:43 AM
Some people have claimed (though this is yet to be tested) that the prosthetics enable him to run faster than an able-bodied athlete of similar height and weight.
He’s known as the ‘fastest thing on no legs’.
Posted by: Scott | June 6, 2007 10:47 AM
I have understanding for some of the claims, but I feel give him a chance man!
People need to be challenged, why not let a double amputee challenge you?
Or someone afraid it might one day become a “race against the machine”?
Posted by: Hermo | June 14, 2007 7:37 PM
Well I have to say first of all that all my respect goes to disabled athletes.
But until it can’t be proved beyond any reasonable doubt that prosthetics aren’t of any advantage I think they can’t be allowed in a official competition.
It’s a matter of respect to the work of those that train hard to achieve results that someone else could reach with “a mechanical help”…
Posted by: paolo | June 30, 2007 2:16 AM
Paolo, I agree with your initial sentiment - these guys deserve the utmost respect.
However, in the ‘innocent until proven guilty’ vein, why not allow him to compete until they’ve had a chance to test things? Realistically, if he were getting any advantage, there’d be people queueing up to have limbs lopped off.
Posted by: Scott | June 30, 2007 2:23 PM